Do disgraced stars cheapen reality shows? Really? I thought reality shows were created by disgraced stars turned whores, for disgraced stars turned whores, and the common people were just trying to horn in on them. Reality shows are here to show us the lowest of the low, and entertain us through ridicule and pity. And whores. Without the whores, you’d lose the guy faction of your market segment. I think they should make a reality show using actual whores, follow them around throughout their day. Hell, you’d probably be able to find a couple johns that would be willing to sign release waivers for a discount that would appear without their faces blocked out. Kevin Federline is calling his agent as we speak. You’d have to call it a documentary though, to get around all those puritans.
Next up would be a porn star reality show. They haven’t done that yet have they? Put it on HBO or Showtime and follow some porn stars around. It would sort of be like that Kardashian show, but you’d get to see the whores actually perform. But not too much, cause they want you to buy the film that’s tied in that week. Put a couple male pornstars on there too and have them act like they have feelings so the chicks want to watch it. Instant in to getting a girl you want to mount into watching porn. I’m a frickin’ genius! Pretty soon she’ll be open to wanting to mimic the positions of the actors on the screen (“Do people really do that honey?” I don’t know, lets try and find out…) I hope some cable TV exec is reading this (yeah right) and goes off and makes this so I can get lucky soon, cause telling chicks I’m a blogger hasn’t gotten me any anal so far.
Do disgraced stars cheapen reality shows? | ScapeGoats.
No related posts.
follow me on Twitter